-------------------------------------
I refer to the letter, "Not the road for IJN," by S.M. Mohamed Idris, President Consumers Association of Penang, (nst. Nov. 6 ) While I appreciate his concern over the proposal by the Malaysian Health care Travel Council (MHTC) to persuade eight American companies to send patients for treatment at the Institute Jantong Negara (IJN), I feel that he should see the proposal objectively, instead of criticizing without weighing and studying the pros and cons why IJN struck such a deal..
The involvement of the American companies, would not only keep Malaysia on the medical travel industry map, but would also enhance the possibility of collaborating with world-renowned universities in California to train our cardiologists and cardiothorices surgeons at IJN or possibly in the United States .
I don't think that as a responsible government with the 1 Malaysia concept of " People first, Performance now", mooted by the Prime Minister, the government would compromise health care of the rakyat, just for the sake of getting rich foreign patients, to be treated at IJN. So there is no ground to have all those fears.
The underprivileged the middle income groups, and the rich Malaysian, will I am sure continue to receive due treatment at IJN, as promised by the Government when the Institute was built.
I think this is a concept of the rich helping the poor rakyat, as the fees collected from them will definitely be channeled to the IJN Foundation to support the underprivileged and needy patients, in Malaysia as evident from the more than 300 patients,old and young, rich and poor from all walks of lives, crowding all the various clinics everyday at IJN..
IJN is Malaysia's premier centre for the treatment of heart diseases, and it is now known throughout the world as one of the best heart centre. Due to the increased in the number of patients, the government recently extended the hospital with a new 200 beded wing, making IJN a 500 beded hospital, Unfortunately IJN is still short of cardiologists, cardiothorices surgeons, para medics, and trained nurses. There in lies the opportunity for more of our doctors to be trained locally and overseas.
I feel that the consumer associatios should instead focus their study on the amount of medication being dispensed to patients by IJN daily, and the cost involved. Every patient, including me, after seeing a doctor , received a six months supply of various types of expensive medicine. I often wonder whether all the patients consumed all the medicine given to them. More often than not some patients just stoped taking certain type of medicine for various reasons and the medicine s are thrown away. On their next oppointment the doctor might change the medicine, and the old ones are not returned. This is a shear waste of public fund.
I suggest that IJN should review their method of dispensing medicine and reduce it to a two months supply only, and if the patients finished their medicine , they should go and get them at either IJN or the nearest general hospital, or at the community clinics, or send by post as practiced by the Putrajaya Hospital.
I am sure IJN can save millions, and the money could be better used to help the underprivileged
NOR SHAHID MOHD NOR
PETALING JAYA